From dd129366575f371bcec51b7303bfb273d6edc8a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?louiz=E2=80=99?= Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:41:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Do not require revocation info for a certificate to be valid If anyone has any reason to believe this is a bad idea, please let me know. --- louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp b/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp index 7fc40c2..600405d 100644 --- a/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp +++ b/louloulibs/network/tcp_socket_handler.hpp @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ public: { return true; } + bool require_cert_revocation_info() const override + { + return false; + } # endif }; -- 2.45.2