From ebd3107a3801b768c91c0321b2dcc59c5124b36b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Himbert Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:08:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] proof reading before publication? couldn't be me --- README.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index dec5398..9870d72 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ For additional plots not shown here, see the [plots](./plots) directory. Generally, all schemes compress the canterbury corpus (2.8 MB) best in terms of both size and throughput (i.e. compression & decompression speed), followed by the "large" canterbury corpus (11 MB), followed by the Silesia corpus (212 MB). ![Size reduction of the Canterbury corpus by compression scheme](plots/compression-canterbury.png) -![Size reduction of the Silesia corpus by compression scheme](plots/compression-canterbury.png) +![Size reduction of the Silesia corpus by compression scheme](plots/compression-silesia.png) ![Compression and decompression speed for the Canterbury corpus by compression scheme](plots/throughput-canterbury.png) -![Compression and decompression speed for the Silesia corpus by compression scheme](plots/throughput-canterbury.png) +![Compression and decompression speed for the Silesia corpus by compression scheme](plots/throughput-silesia.png) Note that compression and decompression speed are depicted with error bars (depicting the square root of the sample variance) but they are almost always smaller than the markers. @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ For the smaller corpora, the shape is roughly the same when accounting for the p ![Decompression speed by size reduction for the Silesia corpus](plots/d-dc-silesia.png) At the highest range of compression (smallest compressed sizes, >70% size reduction), there are four contenders: rust-lzma, brotli/brotlic (which have similar overall performance), bzip2, and zstd. -rust-lzma achieves the best compression and, at a given speed, generally compresses faster than zstd and brotli. +rust-lzma achieves the best compression and, at a given speed, generally compresses better than zstd and brotli. brotli decompresses faster than rust-lzma and zstd decompresses faster than brotli. zstd compresses about as fast or faster than brotli but doesn't quite reach the same top size reduction. bzip2 compresses faster than rust-lzma but has the slowest decompression speed. -- 2.45.2