~exprez135/mountaen

mountaen/site/judiciary.html -rw-r--r-- 2.4 KiB
fe9c8109Nate Ijams Update Arvelie to install properly. 6 months ago
                                                                                
1
<!DOCTYPE html><html lang='en'></head><meta charset='utf-8'><meta name='description' content='A collection of writings on the American Judiciary system.'/><meta name='thumbnail' content='https://wiki.ijams.me/media/services/thumbnail.jpg' /><meta name='viewport' content='width=device-width,initial-scale=1'><link rel='alternate' type='application/rss+xml' title='RSS Feed' href='../links/rss.xml' /><link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='../links/main.css'><link rel='shortcut icon' type='image/png' href='../media/services/icon.png'><title>Tellurium — judiciary</title></head><body><header><a href='home.html'><img src='../media/icon/logo.svg' alt='Tellurium' height='29'></a></header><nav><ul><li><a href='mirrors.html'>mirrors</a></li><li><a href='civilitas.html'>civilitas/</a></li><li><a href='nataniev.html'>nataniev</a></li><li><a href='language.html'>language</a></li><li><a href='hardware.html'>hardware</a></li><li><a href='notebook.html'>notebook</a></li></ul><ul><li><a href='judiciary.html'>judiciary/</a></li></ul><ul><li><a href='stare_decisis.html'>stare decisis</a></li></ul></nav><main><h2>A collection of writings on the American Judiciary system.</h2><h2><a href='stare_decisis.html'>stare decisis</a></h2><p>Stare decisis, latin meaning to "let the decision stand", is the use of previous case law as a rule, deciding factor, or evidence in future cases. Precedence, in a way, creates a third branch of law in addition to statutory law and regulatory law. This writing will specifically argue that hard stare decisis, using precedent as a deciding factor or as immutable fact, is both unconstitutional, unwise, and wrong. Instead, I will argue that precedence should only be used as relevant evidence for what a proper decision might be.</p><ul><li>Why stare decisis should not exist</li><li>The practical problems of precedence</li><li>The havoc of changing precedence</li><li>Sovereign immunity</li></ul></main><footer><a href='https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0'><img src='../media/icon/cc.svg' width='30'/></a><a href='https://fosstodon.org/@exprez135'><img src='../media/icon/fosstodon.png' width='30'/></a><a href='https://git.sr.ht/~exprez135/'><img src='../media/icon/sourcehut.svg' alt='sourcehut' width='30'/></a><span><a href='nathaniel_ijams.html'>Nathaniel Ijams</a> © 2020–2021 — <a href='about.html'>BY-NC-SA 4.0</a></span></footer></body></html>